Ken, saw that video. My daughter never wet the bed. You’re correct . And my 15 year old… she has the static retainer. I’m getting her reviv. The blue one, adult or or children’s yellow one?
you can start with the r1 blue one but kids tend to chew thru it faster.. the r2 medium (yellow) will hold up a lot longer so u can move to that later when the r1 is damaged
I don't want to say this, but it's hard to take you seriously when you claim that pretty much every health issue except genetic ones can be corrected by a mouth guard. If you don't have proof of that (which you don't), don't make such a huge claim. I know that was your experience so far but that's obviously not enough to extrapolate in general.
You say people wearing Reviv are often mouth breathing at the beginning so that discredits the lady's claim. I don't know if her claim is accurate or not but wearing your mouth guard blocks the mouth from drying out for the most part so it's not even close to the same as regular mouth breathing.
Laurie... i guess it depends on what is considered 'proof;.
Over 20,000 reviv appliances have been sold. 1700+ people paid for me to track their journal of doing the process.
I get something like 100 dm's/emails per day giving me updates.
There are hundreds of posts in our skool community of people says themselves what they are experiencing.
I'd estimate that ~1000 people have told me about various improvements they are experiencing which in include various neurological disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, skeletal issues, chronic pain, and lots of other stuff.
So i guess we'll just need to agree to disagree.
And if you don't want to take me seriously.. that is your choice.
A mouthguard is a cheap, non-invasive, reversible way of improving your health.
We give 1 month free trial of our community and I think its worth checking out what others are posting.
It is indeed an extraordinary claim, but rather than demanding proof as the only measure of compellability (not reasonable since this is a self-discovered process EGK only recently discovered and started gathering information on), it would perhaps be better to look into the logic and reasoning behind the claim. Perhaps EGK truly believes a mouthguard alone can solve all health problems, but imo, it is the concept and principle behind what a correctly designed mouthguard can achieve that bears considering.
EGK's claim as far as I understand is that biomechanical collapse, which is a 'physics'-based explanation is the 'root' of all illness. When the 'physics' of the body is poor, then everything functions poorly, and then you have all sorts of apparently different diseases of different origins and causes. In a petri dish, there may be hundreds and thousands of different strands of bacteria and viruses, but one only needs to turn up the heat to kill all of them. In the same way, when the 'physics' of the body is fixed, all the apparently different forms of illness can be cured. It is a claim worth investigating, and one that, to me at least, seems plausible.
EGK believes that a correctly designed mouthguard has a extraordinary effect in 'fixing' the physics of the body. By itself, a mouthguard alone may not be able to entirely fix the 'physics' of the body (or it might, who knows, my own opinion is that it can have a very powerful but probably not complete restorative effect especially if one's jaw and dental structure was damaged), but it may certainly be a very powerful starting point.
not sure i agree that "this is a self-discovered process EGK only recently discovered and started gathering information on"
I talk all throughout the blog about how i first came upon these biomechanics in 2014 and spent 11 years iterating on them on my own body.
I have collapsed and then resurrected myself at least 3-4x over the years which is what allowed me to see the patterns and connections to things like neurology and cognitive function so clearly.
In any case i think the truth will emerge in the coming years the more people do this... and the further people get along in the process.
I've seen how it works over the longer-term.. and the reason i make these more 'crazy' claims is because i am very confident they will be found to be true.
Others will jump in along the way in the coming years with more tests/studies/etc.
But i will point to the fact that i was saying this shit publicly back in 2025 baby! haha
ahh yes, i do remember that you gradually began to 'gather' these concepts since 2014, but in my head, I thought you only 'pinned down' the process and concepts in more recent years ~2020. so that stage of 'completion' and 'refinement' that Reviv was built on was what I had in mind as the 'recent discovery'.
i realized i'd fully understood how this works in late 2021 so i think that is what u are referring to. And so i've been coming back since then... more or less doing the same thing but more efficiently.
But pretty much everything i am doing now to recover i was doing back around 2016.
But i had some flawed ideas about how to 'finish' the bite. And so i locked a single occlusion back then and screwed it all up again.
Then got sidetracked for years with ALF and stuff.
So the only thing that is different about now vs. 2016 is that i realized u dont actually have to 'finish' the bite at all.
You can just continue to wear a mouthguard to sleep and be completely fine. Or u can get flat composite.
Or you can try to create a 'lingualized bite' that supports retrusion and protrusion with the cusps of the teeth, but that is extremely difficult.
i don't know much about heavy metal toxicity tbh so i dont rule out that it can play a role in neurological disorders. But i do have a feeling that the body of a person with very good biomechanics will simply fight it effectively.
And ive not read "Breath" but ive known of it for many years and so know the basic principles as it is cited by airway dentists a fair bit.
I just dont think he he looks back far enough. For me the question is... why do modern humans breathe poorly?
For me breathing is just a function of biomechanics.
And if i can fix the biomechanics and go from breathing erratically to breathing quite well...then it's not a function of the stuff he says it is.
Ken, saw that video. My daughter never wet the bed. You’re correct . And my 15 year old… she has the static retainer. I’m getting her reviv. The blue one, adult or or children’s yellow one?
you can start with the r1 blue one but kids tend to chew thru it faster.. the r2 medium (yellow) will hold up a lot longer so u can move to that later when the r1 is damaged
I don't want to say this, but it's hard to take you seriously when you claim that pretty much every health issue except genetic ones can be corrected by a mouth guard. If you don't have proof of that (which you don't), don't make such a huge claim. I know that was your experience so far but that's obviously not enough to extrapolate in general.
You say people wearing Reviv are often mouth breathing at the beginning so that discredits the lady's claim. I don't know if her claim is accurate or not but wearing your mouth guard blocks the mouth from drying out for the most part so it's not even close to the same as regular mouth breathing.
Laurie... i guess it depends on what is considered 'proof;.
Over 20,000 reviv appliances have been sold. 1700+ people paid for me to track their journal of doing the process.
I get something like 100 dm's/emails per day giving me updates.
There are hundreds of posts in our skool community of people says themselves what they are experiencing.
I'd estimate that ~1000 people have told me about various improvements they are experiencing which in include various neurological disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, skeletal issues, chronic pain, and lots of other stuff.
So i guess we'll just need to agree to disagree.
And if you don't want to take me seriously.. that is your choice.
A mouthguard is a cheap, non-invasive, reversible way of improving your health.
We give 1 month free trial of our community and I think its worth checking out what others are posting.
To join just make a request here
https://www.skool.com/reviv-2885/about
It is indeed an extraordinary claim, but rather than demanding proof as the only measure of compellability (not reasonable since this is a self-discovered process EGK only recently discovered and started gathering information on), it would perhaps be better to look into the logic and reasoning behind the claim. Perhaps EGK truly believes a mouthguard alone can solve all health problems, but imo, it is the concept and principle behind what a correctly designed mouthguard can achieve that bears considering.
EGK's claim as far as I understand is that biomechanical collapse, which is a 'physics'-based explanation is the 'root' of all illness. When the 'physics' of the body is poor, then everything functions poorly, and then you have all sorts of apparently different diseases of different origins and causes. In a petri dish, there may be hundreds and thousands of different strands of bacteria and viruses, but one only needs to turn up the heat to kill all of them. In the same way, when the 'physics' of the body is fixed, all the apparently different forms of illness can be cured. It is a claim worth investigating, and one that, to me at least, seems plausible.
EGK believes that a correctly designed mouthguard has a extraordinary effect in 'fixing' the physics of the body. By itself, a mouthguard alone may not be able to entirely fix the 'physics' of the body (or it might, who knows, my own opinion is that it can have a very powerful but probably not complete restorative effect especially if one's jaw and dental structure was damaged), but it may certainly be a very powerful starting point.
not sure i agree that "this is a self-discovered process EGK only recently discovered and started gathering information on"
I talk all throughout the blog about how i first came upon these biomechanics in 2014 and spent 11 years iterating on them on my own body.
I have collapsed and then resurrected myself at least 3-4x over the years which is what allowed me to see the patterns and connections to things like neurology and cognitive function so clearly.
In any case i think the truth will emerge in the coming years the more people do this... and the further people get along in the process.
I've seen how it works over the longer-term.. and the reason i make these more 'crazy' claims is because i am very confident they will be found to be true.
Others will jump in along the way in the coming years with more tests/studies/etc.
But i will point to the fact that i was saying this shit publicly back in 2025 baby! haha
ahh yes, i do remember that you gradually began to 'gather' these concepts since 2014, but in my head, I thought you only 'pinned down' the process and concepts in more recent years ~2020. so that stage of 'completion' and 'refinement' that Reviv was built on was what I had in mind as the 'recent discovery'.
i realized i'd fully understood how this works in late 2021 so i think that is what u are referring to. And so i've been coming back since then... more or less doing the same thing but more efficiently.
But pretty much everything i am doing now to recover i was doing back around 2016.
But i had some flawed ideas about how to 'finish' the bite. And so i locked a single occlusion back then and screwed it all up again.
Then got sidetracked for years with ALF and stuff.
So the only thing that is different about now vs. 2016 is that i realized u dont actually have to 'finish' the bite at all.
You can just continue to wear a mouthguard to sleep and be completely fine. Or u can get flat composite.
Or you can try to create a 'lingualized bite' that supports retrusion and protrusion with the cusps of the teeth, but that is extremely difficult.
Is there room for heavy metal toxicity in causes of neurological disorders such as ADHD, etc?
About nose vs mouth breathing, have you read the book Breath by James Nestor?
i don't know much about heavy metal toxicity tbh so i dont rule out that it can play a role in neurological disorders. But i do have a feeling that the body of a person with very good biomechanics will simply fight it effectively.
And ive not read "Breath" but ive known of it for many years and so know the basic principles as it is cited by airway dentists a fair bit.
I just dont think he he looks back far enough. For me the question is... why do modern humans breathe poorly?
For me breathing is just a function of biomechanics.
And if i can fix the biomechanics and go from breathing erratically to breathing quite well...then it's not a function of the stuff he says it is.
I talk about this here a bit https://reviv.substack.com/p/breathing-vs-biomechanics